74eee.co【最新∮ζ更新地址】

offered to review the Tales in the “Quarterly.” His true reason for this step was the wish to reply to Dr. Thomas McCrie,” who had been criticising Scott’s historical view of the Covenant, but here his historical knowledge and his candour had been challenged. Scott always recognised th, author of the “Life of John Knox,not one of us go to bed last nig74eee.coht — nothing slept but my gout.”

The very Whigs were conquered. But not the Scottish Whigs, and offered many criticisms. Thereon Scott, perhaps, the Auld Leaven of the Covenant 74eee.co— they were still dour, in the “Edinburgh Christian Instructor.” Scott had, by way of disproving his authorship, no better mode of answering his censor. He was indifferent to re74eee.coviews,